Module 12: Reviewing Manuscripts for Publication

  Reviewing Manuscripts for Publication

Objectives

In this module learners will

  • explain the purpose of the manuscript review process and acquire the desire to become a manuscript reviewer,
  • describe the criteria and discuss the steps to become a manuscript reviewer,
  • commit to becoming a manuscript reviewer,
  • follow the appropriate steps after being invited to review a manuscript,
  • compare and contrast blinded versus non-blinded manuscript reviews,
  • perform a manuscript review applying the criteria of a quality review,
  • critically reflect on the manuscript and make a final recommendation to the editor,
  • maintain the confidentiality of the author and the manuscript throughout the review process, and;
  • use proper format when citing a review on a resume/curriculum vitae.

Lectures

Download Module 12 Slides

How to Review Manuscripts  for Professional Journals (6:18 min)

 

Blinded and Unblinded Reviews (9:28 min)

 

How to Review a Research Paper (7:17 min)

 

Critiquing and Reviewing a Non Research Paper (6:57 min)

 

Confidential Comments to the Editor (4:28 min)

Curriculum Vitae or Resume (2:08 min)

Activities

Download Activity Log Workbook

Readings and Resources

Broome, M. E. (2010). Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review. Nursing Outlook, 58, 169-170.

Christenbery, T.L. (2011). Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23, 15-22.

DeMaria, A.N. (2003). What constitutes a great review? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol, 42(7), 1314-1315.

Dougherty, M.C., Freda, M.C., Kearney, M.H., Baggs, J.G., & Broome, M. (2011). Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: Indicators of quality in manuscripts. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 33,(4), 506-214.

Freda, M.C., Kearney, M.E., Baggs, J.G., Broome, M.E., & Dougherty, M. (2009). Peer reviewer training and editor support: Results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25(2), 101-108.

Froman, R.D. (2006). The importance of peer review. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 253-255.

Harding, A.D. (2010). How to phrase feedback in peer reviews for nurse authors. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 22(4), 333-337.

Henly, S. & Dougherty, M.C. (2009). Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Nursing Outlook, 57(1), 18-26.

Hoppin, F.G. (2002). How I review an original scientific article. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, 166, 1019-1023.

Hoyt, K.S. & Proehl, J.A. (2007). Peer review for professional publications. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 29(3), 260-264.

Kearney, M.H., Baggs, J.G., Broone, M.E., Dougherty, M.C., Freda, M.C. (2008). Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40(4), 395-400.

Miracle, V. (2008). The peer review process. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 27(2), 67-69.

Morton, P.G. (2013). Insights about the manuscript review process. Nurse Author and Editor, 23(3), 1-4.

Spear, H. (2004). On ethical peer review and publication. Nurse Author and Editor, 14(4), 1-3.

Sylvia, L.M., & Herbel, J.L. (2001). Manuscript peer review – A guide for health care professionals. Pharmacotherapy, 21(4), 395-404.